Acellular DPT/ Painless DPT/ DTaP / Pentaxim shortage in India - How to complete vaccination schedule in your child?

With a lot of worried parents calling & writing to me regarding the shortage of Acellular DPT/ Painless DPT/ DTaP / Pentaxim , here is what I am recommending.....
For children completing the primary series (less than 6 months old), I am recommending using whatever vaccine is available - the DTwP brands like Pentavac, easyfive, qquinvaxem etc. to continue the vaccination, rather than wait and delay these vaccinations against serious illnesses.
For children coming at 1.5 years for booster doses, waiting for a few weeks is not that critical, PLUS the chances of local side-effects are also more. Hence I am giving the option to parents to decide if they want to wait, or take the DTwP combinations as mentioned above. 
Regards
Dr Gaurav Gupta

The Art of Parenting - You know the only people sure about the proper way to raise children? Those who've never had any!

Source

I take no credit for the sentiment -- that would go to Dr. Bill Cosby, comedian and philosopher extraordinaire. I do know, however, that no truer words about parenting have ever been spoken.

There is no right way to raise your children. There is no hard and fast rule about what will work in your home, with your particular family, your child's unique personality, the circumstances you are in, the luck or challenges that come your way. All the money in the world can't fix a serious problem. No matter how little you have materially, you can raise an excellent human being if all else falls into place. Consistently teaching your values will usually result in your children having the same values... but not always. Because above and beyond everything else, our children come to us with inherent qualities that we cannot special order, request, or cross off a list as undesirable.

I never imagined a daughter who would forsake Barbie dolls and coloring books in favor of softball and singing -- though in retrospect, I'm so glad she did.

I never imagined a son who would be passionately invested in sports, playing them, studying them and watching them -- oh wait, I think I did.

You see? You never know. Not that these are monumental issues -- in fact, they aren't issues at all, just who my children are.

Remember when your children were little -- pre-school little -- and there was that one child in the classroom who would misbehave far more than the others? Remember how you were sort of smug, maybe a little judgey, thinking to yourself "my child would never do those things?"

Ok, maybe you didn't do that, but I did. A few times. Not a lot.

Well haha. You didn't know, did you. You had no idea what might happen, how your child might cause you grief, or disappoint you, or make you red-faced with anger. No, none of us knew, when our children were little, what the future would bring to us.

It can be tempting to look at others whose children give them sleepless nights and angst-filled days and think you'd know how to fix things. Don't. Because you don't know, can never know, what it's like to raise that particular person to adulthood. You can never comprehend the personality conflicts between a parent and child, a mother and son, a father and daughter.

I've never read a parenting how-to book. There are times when I need advice and guidance, but I can't imagine how a stranger could help me with my particular child. Instead I ask the people who know and love my children for their input, and my husband and I talk... and talk... and come up with our own solutions. That works for us. Usually. Sometimes there are problems that just need time, not intervention.

The one and only rule that I believe would apply to nearly any child is this:

Children learn what they live.

We can only do the best we can, with love and attention and words of wisdom shared and, hopefully, heard.

Ultimately, the one thing those who aren't parents can't understand about being a parent is this: the deep, heartbreaking and breathtaking love that changes you forever when your child is born. This is what makes parenting an art, not a science. This is what makes it a complicated, overwhelming, and fantastic experience. This love.

Sharon Greenthal

Blogger, Empty House, Full Mind. Co-founder, GenerationFabulous.com

Follow Sharon Greenthal on Twitter: www.twitter.com/sharongreenthal

Comment: I have been invited to deliver a talk on the Art of Parenting in my daughter's school, and this wonderful post caught my eye. I believe that unconditional love ( & a little discipline from my wife :) goes a long way in helping my child become a healthy happy adult. In case you don't take my word for it, please get back after 15 years, to confirm if this worked ;)

Why I Got Electroconvulsive Therapy for My Autistic Son - How pop culture is holding back powerful medicine.

By Amy S.F. Lutz

hen I tell people about the electroconvulsive therapy my autistic 15-year-old son Jonah has been getting for the past four years, the response has been ... surprise, certainly. Curiosity. Interest. No horror, no judgment. But that’s to be expected from those close to my family: They know we spent the better part of a decade struggling to manage Jonah’s aggressive and self-injurious behaviors. Countless therapies, behavior plans, medication trials, and even an almost yearlong hospitalization at one of the nation’s premier facilities failed to stop his frequent, intense, and unpredictable rages.

My friends, like most people, originally knew little about ECT beyond the brutal depiction in One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest, but there was no arguing with the results they saw. The boy who broke a teacher’s nose when he was in kindergarten, who left us, his aides, and his teachers bruised, bitten, and scratched—that boy is now tubing with his brother and sisters, riding a tandem bike, and studying Hebrew. The boy who could only be taken out in the community by his father because he was the only one who could still physically manage Jonah’s rages, flew with just me and one of his sisters to Florida for a week at a dolphin therapy program. The transformation has been dramatic, conclusive, and celebrated by all who care about my family.

Now that my book Each Day I Like It Better: Autism, ECT, and the Treatment of Our Most Impaired Children is being published, I’m expecting the reaction to be considerably less benign. In the years I’ve spent researching ECT—first when we decided to pursue it for Jonah and later as I wrote about our story and the experiences of other families—I’ve tried to figure out exactly why it’s so controversial. I’ve been unable to come up with a satisfying answer. The inaccurate but persistent portrayal of ECT in the media and pop culture as a sadistic, soul-crushing punishment obviously contributes.

The response rate for ECT is unparalleled.

Those preconceptions have been reinforced by accounts of some former patients who report losing years of memories following ECT. This is a terrifying prospect, which is doubtlessly why memory loss has been the focus of much research (PubMed lists more than 600 citations). It’s a muddy issue because psychiatric illness, the drugs prescribed to treat it, and ECT can all affect memory, but the findings from studies around the world have been remarkably consistent: If memory loss occurs, it is generally transient and confined to the time immediately surrounding the acute course of treatment. In other words, patients can expect cognitive side effects from ECT similar to those they might experience following other common medical interventions, such as chemotherapy, heart surgery, and anti-seizure regimens.

The response rate for ECT is unparalleled: Approximately 80 percent of patients withmajor depression, the most common illness for which ECT is indicated, are helped, compared with less than 30 percent whose symptoms remit after eight weeks ofantidepressants. Study the data, and it becomes clear why an estimated 100,000 Americans receive ECT every year to treat incapacitating conditions such as severemood disorders, schizophrenia, catatonia, neuroleptic malignant syndrome, andParkinson’s disease.

What most concerned me and other parents I know who pursued this treatment for our children wasn’t the risk of getting ECT. The antipsychotics typically prescribed to kids like Jonah as a first-line treatment for dangerous behaviors come with truly scary and sometimes permanent side effects, including dystonia, tardive dyskinesia, and neuroleptic malignant syndrome. More than 200 kids have died from complications from taking antipsychotics, but not one child has died from ECT since its first use in the pediatric population in the 1940s. No, it was the risks of not getting ECT that kept us up at night: blindness and brain damage from self-inflicted blows to the head, significant injuries to family members and caregivers, physical and chemical restraint in residential placements.

“Without ECT, Brandon would be in an institution, or maybe not even alive,” said Kate, the mother of a 15-year-old son with nonverbal autism and a history of severely self-injurious behavior. I met Kate and Brandon after I had finished my book, so their story isn’t included in it—but I didn’t have room to include all the families with similar stories. Violent behaviors represent a huge problem in the autism community. A 2013 study in Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders found that more than half of autistic kids exhibit aggressive behavior.

When he was 11 years old, Brandon spent nine months at an inpatient unit that treats only children and adolescents with developmental disability and dangerous behaviors. Nothing else had stopped his constant self-injurious behavior, or SIB, which occurred at a rate of 100 blows to the head, bites to the arm, and violent pinches to the leg every hour. Not the special diets and supplements parents typically try first because they seem safe and easy, not the psychotropics that 64 percent of autistic children take, not countless medication trials. The only way Brandon’s doctors found to control the ceaseless SIB was to fit him with arm splints that physically prevented him from bending his arms and hitting himself in the head.

Nine months of intense treatment that targeted the SIB from both pharmacological and behavioral angles failed to reduce it enough to safely remove the splints. When he was discharged, Brandon still had them. Kate was devastated. “When he came home like that, I thought he would be in arm splints for the rest of his life,” she told me.

A few weeks later Kate heard about ECT from a client in an exercise class she was teaching who knew about Brandon’s situation. Three months after he started ECT, Brandon’s arm splints came off. Now, three years later, they are still off. Brandon’s rate of SIB dropped by 90 percent, and the residual behaviors are much less intense. There is no head banging, no more pinching. “We patched all the holes in the walls, and he hasn’t made another one since,” Kate said.

The decrease in SIB was accompanied by an increase in academic performance—which reflects the consistent finding in the literature that patients with severe psychiatric illness have improved cognitive functions following ECT. Brandon is learning to read and do basic math. And even more importantly, his communication has improved. “Before ECT, he had 50 signs,” Kate said. “Now, his signs have quadrupled and he strings them together.” She dismissed a common misperception about ECT: “Brandon isn’t a zombie, exactly the opposite. He’s more alert and happy. He’s finally come back to life.”

The optimist in me hopes that those who lobby to ban ECT just don’t know there are kids out there like Brandon, Jonah, the profoundly ill adolescents in my book, and so many others whose quality of life depends on regular access to ECT. They don’t realize that autistic individuals frequently suffer co-morbid conditions that can cause intense rages over which they have no control, such as bipolar disorder (with which Jonah was diagnosed when he was 9) and catatonia.

Critics of ECT may have never met anyone like Julia, an autistic woman who blinded herself when she was 7 years old from ceaseless punches to the head. This was an especially devastating injury because Julia is nonverbal, so with her loss of sight she lost all functional communication.

Now 27, Julia has been getting ECT for almost two years, and the SIB her parents desperately tried to stop for a quarter of a century is largely gone. Instead of being confined to her home because she couldn’t be safely managed in the community, she is able to enjoy her favorite activities, like nature walks, outdoor concerts, and swimming.

Julia’s parents don’t spend too much time wondering how their daughter’s life might have turned out differently if they had found ECT earlier—20 years ago, the dramatic effects ECT can have in kids like Julia had yet to be featured in the psychiatric literature. Now ECT is getting serious attention as a treatment for children with developmental delay and dangerous behaviors. There are numerous published casereports from hospitals around the world, and Neera Ghaziuddin and Garry Walter’s 2013 academic text Electroconvulsive Therapy in Children and Adolescents includes chapters on the treatment of autistic catatonia and self-injury with ECT. In January, Ricki Robinson, a developmental pediatrician and professor of pediatrics at the University of Southern California, recommended ECT as a treatment for severe cases of autistic catatonia in a guest post on the Autism Speaks blog, which is about as mainstream as it gets in the autism community. Last month, a Virginia television station featured an autistic 25-year-old man who is receiving ECT for extreme SIB.

As awareness increases, however, the ethical debate over the use of ECT in this population is likely to intensify—even if for us, the parents of children whose lives have been transformed, there is nothing to debate. Ethics don’t exist in a vacuum; any discussion of the ethics of giving ECT must be compared to the ethics of withholding an evidence-based treatment from those who are likely to benefit from it, forcing families to live with the constant threat of significant injury to their children or to others, and condemning kids with an already limited future to life on a locked ward. Without a doubt, it would be better if yoga and fish oil could control the underlying neurological impairments that drive these aggressive and self-injurious behaviors, but they can’t. And these profoundly challenged, complex kids deserve every weapon in the medical arsenal that can help them.

Amy S.F. Lutz is the author of Each Day I Like It Better: Autism, ECT, and the Treatment of Our Most Impaired Children. She is president of the EASI Foundation.

Source

Comment: This personal experience shows that therapies that have been virtually 'discarded' from modern medicine as being outdated & barbaric, may still have a role to play in certain serious and intractable problems that do not yet have better treatment options. Also it is important to note that many of the present day treatments have serious side-effects as well. While this article does not mean that every child (or even a majority) of autism should receive ECT, it suggests that ECT still has a role to play in managing serious mental health illnesses.