Saturday, March 29, 2014

South-East Asia Region: Certified Polio Free

Dear All,

Today, on 27th 
March
 2014, 
 WHO’s 
South-East Asia 
R
egion
 is officially declared 
P
olio
-
 free.
 This is an opportunity to look at progress the region has made advancing children’s health, highlight the power of vaccines, and encourage continued political and financial support for polio eradication.
-- 
Today,
 1.8 billion
 people across 
11 countries
 are polio-free thanks to unprecedented commitment from governments, exceptional program quality, and the dedication of millions of community health workers and volunteers.

   
o In 2007, there were approximately 
900
 polio cases 
in SEAR – 
68%
 of all polio cases worldwide. The region has not reported a case since 2011.

  
o Between 1995 and 2013, the polio program conducted at least 
189 nationwide polio campaigns
and administered more than 
13 billion OPV doses
 across the region.

  
o India, once deemed the most difficult place to end polio, recorded its 
last case in January 2011 
– a remarkable triumph that opened the door for the entire region to be certified polio-free.

  
o
 
More than 
3 million front-line workers
 across South Asia (India, Nepal, Bhutan, Maldives, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh) provided oral polio vaccine to children under 5.

--
 Ending polio in these countries—some of which have been polio-free for more than 15 years—forged strong systems that are now being used to advance other health priorities.

  
o In several countries, 
high-performing polio surveillance systems
 have been expanded to track other vaccine-preventable diseases such as measles, neonatal tetanus, and Japanese encephalitis.

 
o In Bangladesh, immunization coverage for essential vaccines (diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis) rose from
82% to 96% 
between 2000 and 2012, in a period of intense polio eradication activity; in Nepal, the rate went from 
74% to 90%
.
-- 
In order to protect gains against polio, we must remain committed to 
improving routine immunization and maintaining sensitive surveillance
.

  
o
 
Recent outbreaks in the Middle East and the Horn of Africa—both linked to virus from endemic countries—are proof that as long as polio exists anywhere, it is a threat everywhere.

Regards,
Dr. Naveen Thacker

Patient Cracks Her Own Mysterious Dual Diagnosis - using genetics !

Ron Zimmerman
March 18, 2014
SAN DIEGO — Kim Goodsell started noticing physical ailments about 20 years ago, when she was in her 30s and training for an Ironman triathlon. She said she felt "a strange instability" related to the adrenaline of training and had to drop out of the competition.
After finally being diagnosed with 2 rare diseases, "I started looking for what I called the unifying field theory to explain why I had both these conditions," Goodsell said here at the Future of Genomic Medicine VII.

"As a physician, I've never met a patient like her," Eric Topol, MD, director of the Scripps Translational Science Institute in La Jolla, California, and editor-in-chief of Medscape, said during an interview. "She was able to crack the unifying diagnosis after having been told by the top experts in the country that she simply had bad luck."
Goodsell, who is now 56, said that years after she quit training, she experienced a run of tachycardia and was given her first diagnosis — arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. After she had a defibrillator implanted, she started experiencing excruciating pain. "I couldn't even hold a fork," she said.
Goodsell's second diagnosis, for the neuropathy, was Charcot–Marie–Tooth (CMT) disease type 2, a progressive degenerative muscle disease. She underwent a full hip replacement for hip dysplasia.
In 2010, Goodsell asked physicians at the Mayo Clinic whether her ailments were related. She was told no. In fact, according to Dr. Topol, the odds of having arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathyand CMT are 4 in 10 million, which is "less than the chance of being hit by an asteroid."
But Goodsell wanted answers. "I started looking for what caused my CMT, what genes might be involved," she said. "I came up with theLMNA gene. Mutations in this gene can cause bone disease, cardiac problems, neuropathy, and systemic degeneration. All my symptoms were there."
Goodsell's geneticist tried to dissuade her from private genomic testing, suggesting that the $3000 cost would be of minimal benefit. But Goodsell insisted.
"Lo and behold, the test came back positive," she said.
Then the real research began for Goodsell, who went on to study the molecular pathways of the products of the LMNA gene. "I found there was a convergence with lamin A/C and desmosomal proteins, and that I had a mutation in the LMNA gene that was perturbating the downstream desmosomal proteins. I wrote a whole dissertation on it," she explained.
The results were remarkable, said Dr. Topol. "Not only did she diagnose her disease, she set up her own treatment plan."
She now follows a strict diet. She eats no processed foods containing excitotoxins (free glutamates), and no gluten or solanine, a toxin found in nightshades like peppers, tomatoes, and eggplant, which she previously loved to eat.
Goodsell now has a new outlook on life. "I've dramatically improved. I've not only attenuated the progression of the disease, I've reversed it," she said. "I had lost function in my left hand and couldn't walk without support. I was in so much pain I couldn't see the purpose of living. But I'm back to my old life, traveling the world with my husband having outdoor adventures."
"She's a great inspiration," said Dr. Topol. "Not only to the public, but also to the medical profession. We were not aware that a patient would be capable of doing what she did. Leading physicians in the country were shocked that she could decipher her own problems. We need to give more respect to consumers."
Inspiration for Doctors and Patients
What is significant about Goodsell, according to Dr. Topol, is her single-minded focus and energy. "She said, 'I'm not going to sit with this, I'm going to research this myself'," he explained. "This is a story of someone with no medical background who focused on her multiple genetic diseases and cracked the case."
This is a particularly instructive case because the technology that Goodsell used is very recent. "Five years ago, she wouldn't have been able to do that research," he explained.
This was "a great way to jumpstart the conference," said John Barnard, MD, a pediatrician and medical director of the Research Institute at the Nationwide Children's Hospital in Columbus, Ohio. "That's really what it's all about — insight on human disease," he told Medscape Medical News.
However, Dr. Barnard added, "my second thought was a negative one. The story is compelling, but the woman was obviously an outlier in terms of knowledge, intellect, and energy to be able to do what she did."
Dr. Barnard said he thought about Ohio, "where I'm from, and Appalachia, where there are a lot of poor people who are uneducated and ignorant about genomics. When we take genomics public, how do we take it to Appalachia, where the healthcare needs are so dramatic, and how do we take it to the south side of Chicago, east St. Louis, and east LA," he asked.
Dr. Topol said that Goodsell is probably the first fully informed genomics patient he's seen in his practice, but that doctors should be prepared for this to change. "I think she's an exemplar of the future."
Going forward, Dr. Topol noted, "there will be a lot more patients like Kim. Millions of people will have their genome sequenced. If doctors don't get 'genomified,' their patients will."
Dr. Topol is a shareholder in Cypher Genomics. Dr. Barnard has disclosed no relevant financial relationships.
Future of Genomic Medicine (FoGM) VII. Presented March 6, 2014.

Is There Really a Sports Gene? - Medscape

David Epstein
Disclosures
March 21, 2014
Editor's Note:

At the Future of Genomic Medicine VII conference in March 2014, leading experts in genomic research and clinical application discussed the expanding influence of genomics on the practice of medicine. Medscape asked David Epstein, author of The Sports Gene: Inside the Science of Extraordinary Athletic Performance, to offer some insight on what clinicians need to know about advances in sports and exercise genetics.
Medscape: Are there individuals with a genetic predisposition to excel in sports?
Mr. Epstein: It is a complicated question and, to some degree, is dependent on the sport skill you are talking about. Some things that were previously thought to be genetic characteristics, such as the bullet-fast reactions of Major League Baseball hitters, turned out to be really the result of practice, whereas other things, such as the compulsive drive to train, turn out to have important genetic components. So it really depends on what you are looking at.
Part of what is coming out of sports and exercise genetics is an idea similar to what came out of medical genetics. Medical genetics is showing us that in some cases, no 2 people will respond to, say, acetaminophen the same way because of differences in genes involved in acetaminophen metabolism. Exercise genetics is showing that this is the same for the medicine of athletic training. No 2 people, because of their genes, will respond quite the same way to the same training stimulus. The goal is to find the optimal training and exercise environment, whether it is for a sports performance or for health effects, for each person's individual genome.
Medscape: How should clinicians address these issues in their own practices?
Mr. Epstein: There are a couple of things that clinicians should keep in mind. Some of them now get questions about testing for genes for athleticism, and usually this will include a gene such as the ACTN3gene, which codes for protein found only in fast-twitch muscle fibers. It is sort of sexy to test for this gene now. If you don't have one of the so-called right versions for sprinting, you just won't be in the Olympic 100-meter final. But that only rules out 1 of 7 billion people on earth, so it is incredibly nonspecific.
To make a decision for a child about what sport they should pursue on the basis of this one gene is like looking at one piece of a puzzle that has a thousand pieces and deciding what the puzzle shows. It is incredibly complex. We don't know a lot of the genes, much less the environmental stimuli that go into this.
For the most part, I think genetic testing for sports prowess should just be ignored. You are better off just seeing what the kid is good at physiologically. The best genetic tool you have for sprinting right now is a stopwatch, not the ACTN3 gene.
That being said, I do think there are genes that clinicians should consider talking with patients and parent about -- genes that predispose people to injuries, such as torn tendons and ligaments. These are genes that code for collagen. And I think it is time to have the conversation about the so-calledAPOE-4 gene variant. We have known for a long time that it predisposes people to having Alzheimer disease, but it now looks like it is involved in all manner of recovery from brain injury.
We are having this national furor about brain trauma in football and, to a lesser degree, in soccer, and there is this gene variant out there that might give some risk information.
When I have talked to clinicians, generally their take has been, "No, we don't want to test people for this, because it is just statistical risk information." But telling someone that smoking puts them at an increased risk for heart attack is also just statistical risk information. And the response I get to that is, "Well, they can stop smoking, but they can't change their DNA."
True -- but they absolutely can change their environment by, for example, not playing football. I think that is a discussion that clinicians should be having with patients soon.
Medscape: Where is research in this field headed?
Mr. Epstein: I think the direction that sports and exercise genetics are going toward is individualized training, to a degree. Obviously, it is very difficult, and we have seen some of the difficulties of individualized medicine. But scientists are making some strides in finding genetic markers that predict differences between people and their responsiveness to a particular training plan. Whether that is how much their cardiovascular system strengthens or how much their blood pressure drops, the idea would be to be able to tell someone, "Look, you want this drop in blood pressure, and you have a set of genes predicting that you can get that with this training, or without even training that hard" -- whereas with some other person, you say, "Wow, you would have to train really hard, so you may need to be medicated." We are making strides in that direction.